| |

|
| |
|
|
For
this design I am using an Australian design process, illustrated on the
left. First I identify what the design is & for whom. Then I investigate
the site, people, needs & issues. Next I evaluate the information (site
analysis, plans & priorities) & produce a draft design outlining
possible options. I consult with the client & then produce a concept design
for the site. From here I would go on & implement the design & then
observe what is & isn't working. This I could reflect upon & then
review the design, producing a better version. This design however didn't quite
reach the implementation stage (at least not yet), so I only follow the process
as far as producing my first concept design. |
|
| |
|
Identify
What: The
design is for an educational Permaculture & History demonstration garden to
support existing teaching at the school & provide new teaching
opportunities. For whom: The clients are the
school; the tutors & the pupils - both boarding & field studies
(indirectly). My client questionnaire was targeted at two of the school staff
who were involved in teaching the current interactive sessions.
Investigate |
|
| |
|
Site: The
first job for me, having accepted the offer to design a garden in the school
grounds was to have a look at the site. My survey began with taking some photos
& then pacing out the distances between the fixed elements already there.
As you see from this first photo, taken looking through the entrance gate on
the north side, it was basically just a flat well mown area, therefore I
haven't concerned myself with contours in my design. The area was bounded on
three sides by fencing & open to the south, although there was a line of
fence posts across the south west corner. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
1. Site size: |
|
Approx 50 m x 40m, essentially rectangular. |
|
|
|
2. Physical challenges: |
| |
Concrete slab foundation from previous building. |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
3. On site
resources: |
| |
- Grass cuttings.
- Food waste.
- Plants for propagating (inc.
water plants).
- Lot of soil from digging
swimming pool.
- Paper & cardboard
waste.
- Manure (from nearby
stables).
- Concrete foundation for a
building?
|
| |
|
|
4. Water catchment: |
| |
Moat available nearby, but also sports hall & proposed
building's roof run-offs are available to be harvested. |
|
|
| |
|
5. Soil: |
| |
Compacted & depleted over a long period of mowing as a
playing field & having the grass cuttings taken away. |
| |
|
|
6. Aspect: |
| |
Generally good; open to the east, hedging to the south,
buildings & tennis court to the west, tall trees to north on far side of
car park. |
| |
|
|
7. Available utilities : |
| |
Water tap by car park fence. Electricity in sports hall. Good
access for materials via car park. |
|
|
| |
|
People:
Having made a base plan of the area I arranged a meeting with two of the tutors
in order to go through my client questionnaire. We held the meeting next to the
wattle & daub building adjacent to the south west corner of the site. I
learned that this building was a prime example of the interactive way in which
the school taught it's pupils. Their specialist areas were in history &
environmental studies. As well as having a fairly small number of boarders, the
school took a lot of children from inner city schools in order to introduce
them to the importance of looking after our natural environment & to give
them a taste of how people really used to live. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
1.
Number of people on site and relationships: |
| |
Varies, but classes of up to 30 children & one or two
tutors may be using the garden at a time. |
| |
|
|
2. Physical challenges: |
| |
Disabled access required. |
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
3. Occupations and skills:
|
| |
Gardener employed on site, though likely to be unfamiliar with
some of the plants' requirements. Also tutors with skills in History (keen
amateur gardener) & Environmental sciences. |
| |
|
|
4. Ages: |
| |
Children are all ages from 4 to 13 years old boarding &
older on field studies courses. |
| |
|
|
5. Resources: |
| |
Volunteers (Parents, Tutors, Pupils?). Skills (mentioned
above). |
| |
|
|
6. Addresses of local like minded
people: |
| |
Kingcombe Meadows -
Dorset Wildlife Trust, Dorset Trust for Nature Conservation. |
|
|
| |
|
Needs:
The needs that came up as part of our initial client
interview were later added to as a result of my suggestions, particularly in
relation to the Permaculture garden. I was also contacted by one of the History
tutors with specific needs in that area too. The general needs were:
- History gardens (food, dyes,
materials etc).
- Wildlife habitats.
- Permaculture demonstration
garden.
- An extra outdoor element to
interactive teaching.
- To teach other observation
skills.
- Disabled access.
- Classroom materials.
- Low cost.
- Easy maintenance.
- Maintain clear access to both
gateways in fence
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Issues:
Financial
situation: Only £500 was initially made available as budget for
the project, though this was later increased to £1000. This is still a
very small amount though & raising more money is also going to be necessary
for the project to be funded completely. Disabled
access: In order to accommodate wheelchairs, the paths will need to be
wider than usual, reducing growing space & using more materials (costing
more). The surface will have to be hard enough to cope with thin wheels &
still drain safely (i.e. not get icy in Winter). Deer
& rabbits: The wild deer & rabbits are potentially a problem in
terms of the plants & trees, so these will need protection. The site is on
the perimeter of the main buildings & is quite vulnerable to visiting
browsers there. Building: The old concrete
foundation may become home to a shed in the near future, though it is not clear
exactly what form this will take & if a simple set of pathways will be
sufficient access to it. |
|
| |
Researching Historical Plants
The tutor that I was liaising with talked to the other
tutors involved & then wrote to me again with further details of the needs
of the history tutors. Having been informed about this, I then had more
research to do before I could start on the next stage of the process. Included
with the letter shown here was a list of plant species suitable for a Roman
plot, but I needed to find out more about which plants were used during each of
the proposed periods in history in order to know what to include in the
different gardens. At first I looked up the dates in which different plants
were introduced into this country & by whom. Many plants in more recent
centuries were introduced for ornamental reasons, but going back a bit further,
the reasons were more often practical ones. Invading armies brought plants with
them to provide them with familiar food & medicines for instance. I then
looked at history books devoted to the periods in question, but a surprisingly
little amount of information was to be found there, even in chapters about
daily living. Considering that food is essential to our survival, I was amazed
at how hard it was to find out about people's diets during the periods in
question. |
|
|
|
| |
|
Eventually I was able to come up with plant lists for the
different periods & I had these to use as a basis for my designs, but it
wasn't going to be as straightforward as including all the plants on my lists.
|
|
| |
 |
|
According to my research the Romans
introduced Ground Elder as it was a favourite vegetable of theirs, but would it
really be sensible to deliberately plant this in a small area & expect it
to stay there? No doubt one of the reasons that they chose it was that it
required no looking after to keep providing them with food; a good enough one
to justify the choice of many other equally vigorous species, but an invasive
plant in a small garden is not a situation that would be easy to maintain. This
is a situation where maintaining the complete authenticity of a garden could
create repercussions throughout the overall setup. Obviously, each period also
had different types of gardens, there have always been the wealthy & the
poor & their gardens would have been very different. Therefore, the gardens
were going to have to be created to fit in with the sessions that the tutors
would be teaching. There was also a request for three areas to be put aside to
represent different more recent agricultural practices; hay meadow, grazed land
& monocultured cereals. All of these may have to be in some way shielded
from each other as wild flowers could easily set seed from one area to another
through the fencing. |
|
| |
|
Evaluate
Site
analysis:
The site is more or less a 'clean
slate', with just the concrete foundation & a single drain cover roughly in
the middle of the site to work around. The access is very good & there are
two main flows through the site. One runs from the pedestrian gateway by the
sports hall across to the wattle & daub building & the other is for
vehicles occasionally entering from the car park & heading for the main
playing field area to the east. |
|
| |
|
The gates in the tennis court fence
are rarely used, but should still be made accessible. Placing a multi-purpose
building on the concrete foundation provides a good solution to what is
otherwise a problem. This becomes an essentially 'fixed' element because of the
extra work involved in placing a building elsewhere, so it becomes a good place
around which to design the garden. It makes most sense to me to keep the
History gardens at one end & the Permaculture garden at the other. As they
are going to be more work to maintain, the History gardens shouldn't be too
big, preferably collectively no bigger than the Permaculture garden which has
so many more potential learning opportunities to offer. It makes most sense I
feel to put the History gardens at the same end as the Wattle & Daub
building to provide that continuity & to arrange them around a central
element. The Permaculture gardens will in time have a few canopy trees & so
these should go at the north end of the site where they will shade neither the
rest of the Permaculture or the History gardens. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
There is currently very little in the
way of vertical surfaces to utilise. The tennis court fence could become a
trellis for climbing plants. The sports hall wall has an easterly aspect, but
could still be a good growing space. The other fencing is only a few feet high,
but again could provide a little plant support. Disabled access isn't a problem
in terms of gradients, though to accommodate wheelchairs, the paths will have
to be wide & firm, ruling out a lot of recyclable materials straight away.
I investigated this further & obtained a list of suitable materials, though
none of them feel very appropriate for our site. Concrete which seems to be the
most recommended surface feels particularly out of place, but this may be the
only feasible option if all others are excluded.
Zones &
sectors:
As the garden is being created more
for educational purposes than for productive ones, I am designing it to
demonstrate the principle of zones, by the closer than normal placement of
elements in a small space. The building is considered to be the home (zone 0)
& the zones travelling out from there. Zone 1 will be elongated along the
line of the pathway through the site. Zone 5 will be 'simulated' by the
complete fencing off of a corner at the edge of the site. When the hedge is
established it will also act as a wildlife corridor around the site. The site
itself, while not being in a zone 1 situation exactly in relation to the school
buildings (being outside the moat), is still on a regularly travelled route
& so will receive plenty of attention. The sectors are very favourable.
North winds are buffered by tall trees just beyond the car park. The rest of
the site is very open & receives a lot of direct sunshine. The addition of
a building on the site would provide a bit more variety, including a shady
area, which is something that is almost entirely absent at present. Shade under
trees in the future could also be utilised to enable the growing of more
shade-loving species. |
|
| |
 |
|
Principles:
Some examples of how I am applying
permaculture principles in the garden:
Minimum effort
for maximum effect: Collecting the water run-off from the sports hall
roof. Using existing posts as the basis for a fence. Growing climbers up the
tennis court fence. All fences collect wind blown fertility (leaves etc.) for
plants below them. Creating beds using mulching methods. Creating a
'wilderness' area by simply fencing off the one open side. |
|
| |
|
Multiple
supply: Providing information on signs around the garden, in handouts
& from the tutors themselves. Watering the garden comes from the rain
directly & indirectly (off roofs & into rain butts), the moat &
from a standpipe by the fence. Permaculture demonstration plants are also being
grown in History gardens where appropriate. Soft fruit grows together (where it
can be netted) & also as part of the orchard guild; these could produce
early & late crops & growth can be compared between the two.
Multiple
yield: Choosing useful permaculture plants from the list for growing in
the cottage garden; they can be both 'historical' & useful. Climbing plants
hide tennis court fence & provide scent/fruit/shelter etc. Children help
maintain garden & learn from it too. Composting area provides education,
uses waste & feeds the soil. Plants provide food &/or useful materials
& learning opportunities. Eco-building provides classroom area, exhibition
space & an example of eco-construction. Trees & hedges provide shelter,
food, habitats, biomass, vertical growing space etc. |
|
| |
|
The problem is
the solution: Using waste resources from local businesses, local
stables, the School etc for mulching. Using waste containers from homes, the
School etc for growing plants in. Utilising the concrete foundation for a new
building. Utilising the soil heap a short distance away (from the construction
of the swimming pool) in the garden beds. Using bricks from foundation to make
a pathway to the building. Hiding the unsightly chainlink by growing productive
climbing plants up it.
Relative
location: The History gardens are placed next to the wattle & daub
building & around a central element. The building is placed near the centre
of the site. Demonstration of zoning in the garden. Ponds placed in beds, where
frogs can hop out & eat slugs for instance & the body of water stores
heat near plants for slow release.
Stacking:
The temporal stacking of plants (choosing seasonal varieties of fruits &
planting in different microclimates). The vertical stacking of plants &
trees (utilising all the seven vertical layers of growing space). |
|
 |
|
| |
|
Plans:
Having analysed the options that were
available to me in this design, I clarified the plans for the garden:
- To create History gardens to assist
with teaching interactive sessions.
- To erect a building to act as a
classroom & display area.
- To create a garden to teach
Permaculture principles.
- To provide sensory exercises for
students to expand their awareness.
- To incorporate classroom materials
to assist the outdoor sessions.
- To become a venue for Permaculture
design courses.
- For the garden to fund itself
through activities like the above.
Priorities:
It was important to assess some
priorities in order to create a phased plan of implementation for the design.
Also having a limited budget meant that I needed to decide on what it was best
to spend that money upon & what would wait a little longer for further
funding if necessary. The main elements that I needed to address immediately
were the following:
- Producing a draft design drawing
& suggestions for the School.
- Topping up funding (needing to
apply for grants & that would require a funding document).
- Identifying relevant funding bodies
& finding out when they met.
- Identifying the areas that I needed
help with so that I could seek it out.
- Finding out what classroom
materials were already available to back up the outdoor teaching.
For the funding document I also needed to
determine:
- The overall costs for the
project.
- The educational aspects of the
different gardens.
- A plant list for each of the
gardens.
- A phased implementation scheme,
starting with planting the trees.
|
|
| |
|
|
Of course, this last element provides
me with a prioritisation of tasks for the rest of the implementation process.
First of all though I needed to come up with a budget for the design.
Costings:
I started to work out some rough
costings for the project, looking initially at the price of materials such as
fencing (until the hedge became established), plants & trees. I didn't know
what to charge for my work; either the designing, research & fund-raising
or the actual labouring that would inevitably come later. This was something
that was going to require me to know how many hours it was all likely to take
me & quite frankly, without having any similar experiences to compare it
with, I didn't have a clue. I needed more help with this element of the design
in particular & I sought it from my Design support tutor, Simon
Shakespeare. At this time I also obtained from the Permaculture Association a
list of potential funders to approach that might help out with the project
costs. |
|
| |
|
Funding
document:
With the lack of an appropriate budget
it was clear that we were going to have to seek additional funding for the
project. The was completely new territory for me, but I did find out that
before we could apply to any grant-making bodies, I was going to have to come
up with a funding document. This was to explain to the funders the all the
'whats', 'whys' & 'hows' & to provide a realistic figure for the
costing of the project. In order to get some advice on this I booked a Diploma
Support Tutorial with Simon Shakespeare after I met him to install a display in
Exeter's main library. I asked him about his own experiences being involved in
L.E.E.P & how they
had dealt with funding, planning & such matters. He brought along a copy of
the L.E.E.P funding
document, which was shorter than I had expected & I noted down the headings
that they had used to give me more of an idea how to go about producing one for
the School. Using Simon's advice & feedback I was able to start putting
together the funding document & to decide what I needed to say inside it,
though the costings that he was suggesting were way beyond what the School had
available to put towards the project. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
I'm not sure that I went away feeling
any clearer about this aspect of the design, which was as much down to me not
asking enough of the right questions. I did get a boost though when I was able
to obtain a list of potential funding bodies from the Permaculture Association
at this time. Having ascertained that there were actually some addresses for me
to write to, I now needed to put together the funding document to send to them
all. Following Simon's advice, I decided to keep the main part of the document
to a few pages & then add appendices for those who wanted to know more
details. |
|
| |
|
|
The main body would include details
like the purpose of the project, the design drawing, a timescale of phased
implementation & a budget. The appendices would cover the finer detail of
what we were planning to do & would also include an explanation of
Permaculture, for those who were unfamiliar with it's ideas. I was also going
to include appendices about the educational aspects of both the History &
Permaculture gardens, I just had to decide how to present the ideas. I already
knew what the School wanted to do with the History gardens, as they were the
experts at teaching this subject, but I was the one with the Permaculture
knowledge. |
|
| |
|
My original client interview had given
me the opportunity to discuss with the tutors what potential learning
opportunities lay within the Permaculture garden. Now it was time to clarify
what they were going to be & categorise them for inclusion in the Funding
document. The different elements that I came up with fell nicely under the
following headings: |
|
| |
|
Observation: Taste. Texture. Sound. Colour. Scent.
Resources: Composting, fertility & the food cycle.
Recycling rubbish (John Yeoman style); pots, cloches, mulches etc. 'Weeds' -
what they tell us, what uses they have. Biofuels. Microclimates. Water
catchment. Dye plants.
Natural
balance: Companion planting / guilds. Diversity (beneficial
relationships). Habitats (attracting pest predators). Ground cover (mulches;
living & 'dead').
Minimum effort
for maximum effect: Zones & sectors. Stacking (vertical &
temporal). Low maintenance perennials, shrubs & trees. John Yeoman 'lazy
gardener' techniques etc.
Design:
Shelterbelts. Guilds. Multiple supply & yield etc.
Creativity: Willow sculpting. Dyeing. |
|
|
|
| |
|
Many of these elements would also
require back up classroom materials, which were going to have to be created as
far as I could see & this would tie in with the Permaculture & the
National curriculum working group that I had also got involved in. The other
appendices would include the plant lists for the garden & their reasons for
inclusion. This information was already mostly gathered; both from my research
into the historical use of plants & from my own experiences of growing
plants, particularly in Eire & Somerset. |
|
| |
|
|
Planting:
I devised my planting implementation
scheme based upon a logical order in which to create the garden, the time that
I anticipated that it might take to do & the practicalities of when it was
possible to plant (i.e. trees during the winter months). The process of
choosing the different plants that I have listed in the appendices was done by
listing the possibilities & then deciding which were the most valuable
species to be included. For the canopy, fruit & nut trees, this was an
important process as these will be large & essentially fixed elements in
the garden & there are not many places to be had. The smaller species are
easier to move or replace & so these lists are less precise. I start out
with species to try first & as the garden evolves, these will be moved
around & replaced where necessary to find the most successful ones &
the best sites for them. Plants for different purposes may be more or less
practical to use & as for instance, my experience with dye plants is very
limited, I may not be choosing the best species for dyeing with. All these
lists then are open to being adapted & added to on an ongoing
basis. |
|
| |
|
With all of this work done I was then
able to pull together a first draft of the funding document, minus the costings
& a few smaller details. To fill these in, I needed to get some more
feedback from the school about my design ideas, only then could I complete it
to everyone's satisfaction.
Possible Options |
|
| |
|
Draft
design:
At this point I was finally able to
create a draft design for the garden, incorporating all the main elements
required. Because we were going to be including gardens from different periods
in history, it was suggested to me that a timeline could be used to lead
students through the site. I could see that this could also be used as the
thread that tied the two main elements together. We had the Historic gardens,
the three 'modern' land uses & then we had Permaculture; the future garden!
|
|
 |
|
| |
|
I sent this drawing to the School
along with the letter below, describing what I had been able to find out about
the different historical periods & explaining a little about what the
Permaculture garden would be able to demonstrate. I outlined the possible
options & asked for some feedback about my ideas for the garden, so that I
could go on & produce a more final design. At this point I also mentioned
my concerns about the budget being so low & asked them if they had any
connections of their own that could potentially yield any grants to help fund
the project. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Feedback:
As you can see, the feedback I
received from the tutor I was liaising with was very positive, but again
reflected my own concerns about the budget. She asked me to come up with a
phased & costed plan & so once again it came back to me finishing off
the funding document. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Summary:
This proved to be the point at which I
stumbled over the costings for the project & this was tied in with my
inability to estimate how much of my time the project was going to involve
& what my time was worth. Previous experiences where jobs took far longer
that I had originally estimated were making it hard for me to propose a fair
figure without risking ending up having to do the job for a pittance. Then an
additional issue came up around the possibility of placing an eco-building on
the concrete foundation instead of a modern chemically-impregnated shed. This
could be utilised as a classroom, an undercover exhibition & a
demonstration of permaculture construction techniques. A straw bale building
would fit the bill & also be a modern version of the wattle & daub
house that stood only a few yards away. Of course, this extra element brought
in much more for me to consider, including more of those dreaded costings. It
also meant that if I made the garden beds first, the access for the delivery of
materials was going to be very restricted. |
|
| |
|
I felt that it most certainly would
make no sense energetically to do anything other than putting the building up
first. I contacted Simon Pratt, having attended a slideshow on strawbale
building that he had done at the East Meon convergence & what he told me
suggested that the building may cost in the region of £1000, using
volunteer labour. There were also planning issues to consider though & he
gave me the address of a local person who would be able to give me more advice
on the subject. I had received feedback from the tutor about my draft design at
the end of August, but I spent the winter trying to come to terms with the
costings & the extra eco-building element that I really wanted to include.
Before I knew it, it was Spring & the chance to plant out the bare-rooted
trees was gone for another year with eco-building plans & costings still to
be worked out & funding still to be applied for. I hope that one day, with
more knowledge & experience I will be able to complete the project (the
site is still just grass & there is no shed on the concrete foundation).
For now though, this is as far as I have got. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
The Final design drawing I came up
with, along with an explanation of my design decisions & a copy of the
almost completed funding document (before the inclusion of the eco-building)
can be found on the Final
design page. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Home Page |
My Ten Designs |
Design Summary |
Final Design |
Design Review |
Site Map |